If then one sees being Catholic as the religion based on the existence and teachings of Jesus the G

Church of Dudeism Dudeism: the answer to anything. What is Dudeism The Manifesto Take It Easy The Big Lebowski Lexicon About Dudeism Dudeism Religion Law and Order Dudeista Donate to Priest Priest Dudeista in-Service Archive Contact Sitemap Links Various Dudeism Store Cookie Policy
A colleague some time ago I did an interesting question: "If I was baptized as a Catholic I can be ordained as Reverend Dudeista or I have to somehow recant my previous faith?" My answer is: "It depends on how rigidly see recant your previous faith but something is deeply tiring. "
The way I see it the real and fundamental requirement of Dudeism is not to be rigid, or try to be as little as possible. So if one is Catholic but sees his religion so relaxed there is nothing wrong with "add" philosophy Dudeista because even if the existence of any God is not part of the Dudeism Dudeism can be part of existence of any God.'m not sure if I have explained myself well enough.
If then one sees being Catholic as the religion based on the existence and teachings of Jesus the Good then the problems are equal to zero. I believe that, at least as we have told the Good Jesus would have no problem with Dudeism and if not then he gave them any objection raised by religions that refer to him is zero. And together with the Good Jesus probably also the Happy Buddha would think the same thing. I mean, if the instigators of a religion may find the Dudeism philosophy "cool" dog door bell I do not see how the current faithful believers or may not agree. Unless you have the wrong religion and they do not play golf.
Obviously, however, if one thinks that his religion of origin, including Atheism, both at face value then I see difficult that it can also be a Dudeista, dog door bell and this also applies to those who think they Dudeisti but in reality they are not. Being rigid is not part of Dudeism. If I think that The Big Lebowski is the beginning and the end of my beloved religion and that the Dude is the only way of life to be followed and that all those who think differently from my mistakes then you are nothing more than a kind of fundamentalism which replaced a way of seeing the universe with another.
To be good you have to be flexible Dudeisti which does not mean to be ricottas but neither of Grana Padano. You have to know how to find the right balance as the tree of bamboo that bends but does not bend and not break. dog door bell One can believe in a God, in many gods, the Great Mother, the Tooth Fairy or Hell Dragon greasy but if he can see his mother religion with common sense and in a relaxed manner can be a Dudeista 100 percent. At the same time one can sit sbracato all day drinking beer and smoking salvia but being a nihilist or a reactionary.
It 'clear that if one starts from a religion which provides for the taking at face value and as the only way possible to follow bovinamente a book or a movie exclusion of everything else then be Dudeista is practically out of the question. So in the end it depends on each person, if he has no stake in the c ** oo. Up to a certain point count the dictates of a single religion, then comes in the personal point of view and as one sees it and usually one hard drive you choose a religion or sees it rigidly. A few years ago there were people who thought to exterminate the Native Americans was a good thing because dog door bell they were unbelievers and soulless but that was not the thought dog door bell of Bom Jesus, was the point of view of men who claimed to believe in him. And a good excuse to steal land.
At the same time, nowadays there are religions, one in particular, dog door bell which still provide for the elimination of the unbelievers as a species of non-humans as happened in Nazi concentration camps. But even all'nterno of this religion there are currents that see it very differently though based on the same book and profess peaceful co-existence and not on the edge of a sword between religions or different points of view.
Where does this leave us? To the fact that it is true that there are other religions rigid and very relaxed but most often it is the man who makes the religion and sees what he wants to see according to its nature and its point of view. If you are someone who thinks that women are inferior beings I choose a religion that always relegate to second place, or third. If I think they are on par with me then I will act accordingly and I will be a religion that gives equal status to men and women.